38th Annual Meeting of the Society for Invertebrate Pathology

August 7-11, 2005  Anchorage, Alaska, U.S.A
   

Fungus: Systematics and ecology of Entomophthorales

4 results

Systematics of the arthropod-pathogenic Entomophthorales

Siegfried Keller
Agroscope FAL Reckenholz, Swiss Federal Research Station for Agroecology and Agriculture, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zurich

225 species of arthropod-pathogenic Entomophthorales are described. They are attributed to four families, however, the large majority belongs to the families Entomophthoraceae (196 species including 38 species of Tarichium) and Neozygitaceae (18 species). Morphological studies and a compilation of the literature data led to the description of three subfamilies of the Entomophthoraceae and to the description of a new genus in the family Neozygitaceae. Further, “weak” points in the systematics were localised and research gaps addressed.

Ecology of Entomophthorales: A European perspective

Jørgen Eilenberg1, Stanislaw Bałazy2, Jürg Enkerli3, Anselme Fournier3, Annette Bruun Jensen1, Siegfried Keller3, Charlotte Nielsen1, Cezary Tkaczuk4, Franco Widmer3
1Department of Ecology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK 1871 Frb. C., Denmark
2Research Center for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ul Bukowska, PL 60-809, Poznan, Poland
3 Agroscope FAL Reckenholz, Swiss Federal Research Station for Agroecology and Agriculture, CH 8046 Zürich, Switzerland
4 University of Podlasie, Department of Plant Protection, ul. Prusa 14, PL 08 – 110 Siedlce, Poland

The European COST Action 842 on Entomophthorales had as one aim to reveal novel information about the ecology of Entomophthorales. This was done by:

1) Workshops on practical sampling and diagnosis of Entomophthorales
2) Workshop discussions on methodologies for prevalence assessment
3) Initiation of new research programmes
4) Joint actions between scientists from different countries

With respect to 1) collection trips were performed in Switzerland and Poland, for example in the nature reservation of Białowieza with high biodiversity of Entomophthorales. Concerning 2) we tended to develop consensus about terms like ‘prevalence’ and the practical implications of these for studies on Entomophthorales. With respect to 3) new Danish projects on the genetic composition of host and pathogen in an aphid-Pandora neoaphidis system as well as the winter survival of the fungus will be presented. In addition, we will report on a Swiss project on the development of cultivation independent genetic tools for the study of P. neoaphidis in the environment. Finally, the action supported the possibilities for joint projects between European laboratories 4). One example of this is a co-operation between a Swiss and a Danish team to explore PCR techniques for cultivation independent tracking of Entomophthoralean species in soil samples.

Ecological studies underpinning the development of conservation biological control with Pandora neoaphidis in UK

J.K. Pell1, S. Ekesi2, A.M. Tymon 3 and P.A. Shah4
1PIE Division, 3PPI Division, 4Rothamsted International, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK
2International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya

Reforms to the Common Agricultural Policy in Europe encourage farming practices which protect the environment and maintain biodiversity in agroecosystems. This includes the planting of flower and seed rich field margins supporting insects and birds. With small adjustments these margins could also maintain populations of beneficial organisms such as entomopathogenic fungi, thereby contributing to pest management. We hypothesised that Pandora neoaphidis, a common aphid pathogenic fungus in temperate field crops, could be exploited in this way. Fundamental ecological studies on host range, dispersal and transmission were required to underpin this strategy. Field margin plants with potential as reservoirs of P. neoaphidis were identified, e.g. Yorkshire fog (Holcus lanatus), legumes such as bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and stinging nettles (Urtica dioica). Cross transmission and dispersal of the fungus between aphid species occuring in margins and crops and positive interactions with other natural enemies were demonstrated. Pest and non-pest aphids varied in their susceptibility to P. neoaphidis but there was no biological or molecular relationship between original host of an isolate and host range suggesting that free movement of P. neoaphidis between different aphid hosts was possible. These data underpin the exploitation of field margins as reservoirs of P. neoaphidis for aphid control.

Bizarre interactions and endgames: Entomopathogenic fungi and their arthropod hosts

Helen Roy1, Don Steinkraus2, Jørgen Eilenberg3, Ann Hajek4 and Judith Pell5
1 Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Polytechnic University, East Road, Cambridge, CB1 1PT,2Department of Entomology, 319 AGRI, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, 3 Department of Ecology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 1871 Frb. C., Denmark, 4Department of Entomology, Cornell University, 6126 Comstock Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853-0901, 5Plant and Invertebrate Ecology Division, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, Al5 2JQ

Invertebrate pathogens and their hosts are taxonomically diverse. Despite this, there is one unifying concept relevant to all such parasitic associations: both the pathogen and host will adapt to maximize their own reproductive output and ultimate fitness. The strategies adopted by pathogens and hosts to achieve this goal are almost as diverse as the organisms themselves but studies examining such relationships have traditionally concentrated on aspects of host physiology. Here we report on a review of examples of host-altered behavior and consider these within a broader ecological and evolutionary context. Research on pathogen-induced/host-mediated behavioral changes demonstrates the range of altered behaviors exhibited by invertebrates including behaviorally induced fever, elevation seeking, reduced or increased activity, reduced response to semiochemicals, and changes in reproductive behavior. These interactions are sometimes quite bizarre, intricate, and of great scientific interest.

XML feed